Case Study: Geoff's Investment in Bancinsurance - Both His Letters to the Board of Directors

by Geoff Gannon


In an earlier post about Bancinsurance (BCIS), I answered a reader’s email that asked:

\n
\n

I came across your Barnes and Noble write up on GuruFocus. I noticed in the comments section you mentioned two letters you sent to the board of directors of an insurance company you owned. Would I be able to get those off of you? 

\n
\n

I only included my first letter to the board in that post. This post – at the bottom – includes both my letters to the board of directors.

\n

I’m not showing you these letters because they influenced the board. They didn’t. The CEO first offered $6 a share. The board finally agreed to $8.50. I had nothing to do with that.

\n

I’m showing you these letters, because readers ask about my own investments. What kind of stocks do I pick? And how do I value them? These 2 letters give you an idea.

\n

Obviously: they were written for a specific audience.

\n

So – yes – I went out of my way to use conservative estimates of Bancinsurance’s value in these letters. I asked the board to reject any offer less than book value. Does that mean I thought Bancinsurance was worth book value?

\n

Hell no.

\n

I thought Bancinsurance was worth more than book value. Still do. And – in private – I would’ve told you that. I talked about book value in the letters, because I was asking for something. I wasn’t being rational. I was being reasonable.

\n

I only owned 0.5% of Bancinsurance. As I said in an earlier post: I would’ve liked to own a lot more. I didn’t have the time and volume I needed to get the shares I wanted. That’s life.

\n

I wasn’t a big shareholder. The board didn’t care what I wrote.

\n

They eventually settled on an arbitrary number: $8.50. Book value had risen to $9.50. There’s no logical reason for the $8.50 a share number. They outline reasons in the going private transaction report. None of them are logical.

\n

If you want to learn about the $8.50 a share Bancinsurance deal and how it values the company, read my 2 letters to the board, Raymond James’s presentation, and the going private report to the SEC.

\n

Here are my letters to the Bancinsurance board of directors. The first letter was sent in April and argues against the CEO's original $6 a share offer. The second letter was sent in July and argues against the CEO's raised $7.25 a share offer. The board later agreed to the CEO's re-raised $8.50 offer.

\n

Geoff Gannon's 1st Letter to Bancinsurance's Board of Directors \t\t\t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t Geoffs 2nd Letter to Bancinsurance's Board of Directors \t\t\t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t\t \t

\n

Talk to Geoff about Bancinsurance (BCIS)

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-50a7cebfe4b0c0c48aba7400">

In an earlier post about Bancinsurance (BCIS), I answered a reader’s that asked:

I came across your Barnes and Noble write up on GuruFocus. I noticed in the comments section you mentioned two letters you sent to the board of directors of an insurance company you owned. Would I be able to get those off of you? 

I only included my first letter to the board in that post. This post – at the bottom – includes both my letters to the board of directors.

I’m not showing you these letters because they influenced the board. They didn’t. The CEO first offered $6 a share. The board finally agreed to $8.50. I had nothing to do with that.

I’m showing you these letters, because readers ask about my own investments. What kind of stocks do I pick? And how do I value them? These 2 letters give you an idea.

Obviously: they were written for a specific audience.

So – yes – I went out of my way to use conservative estimates of Bancinsurance’s value in these letters. I asked the board to reject any offer less than book value. Does that mean I thought Bancinsurance was worth book value?

Hell no.

I thought Bancinsurance was worth more than book value. Still do. And – in private – I would’ve told you that. I talked about book value in the letters, because I was asking for something. I wasn’t being rational. I was being reasonable.

I only owned 0.5% of Bancinsurance. As I said in an earlier post: I would’ve liked to own a lot more. I didn’t have the time and volume I needed to get the shares I wanted. That’s life.

I wasn’t a big shareholder. The board didn’t care what I wrote.

They eventually settled on an arbitrary number: $8.50. Book value had risen to $9.50. There’s no logical reason for the $8.50 a share number. They outline reasons in the going private transaction report. None of them are logical.

If you want to learn about the $8.50 a share Bancinsurance deal and how it values the company, read my 2 letters to the board, Raymond James’s presentation, and the going private report to the SEC.

Here are my letters to the Bancinsurance board of directors. The first letter was sent in April and argues against the CEO's original $6 a share offer. The second letter was sent in July and argues against the CEO's raised $7.25 a share offer. The board later agreed to the CEO's re-raised $8.50 offer.

Geoff Gannon's 1st Letter to Bancinsurance's Board of Directors Geoffs 2nd Letter to Bancinsurance's Board of Directors